Saturday, 26 September 2009

Offshore Oil Or Offshore Wind

Offshore Oil Or Offshore Wind
What should we be building off our coasts: wind turbines or oil derricks?

The United States has suffered through seven and a half years of energy policy created by two oil executives, with little to show but higher prices and billions in wasted subsidies. John McCain last week decided to double down on this dubious bet by giving energy companies whatever they want. Last week, he announced that he would open up coastal waters for oil drilling. To add insult to McCain's self-inflicted political injury, George Bush echoed his call within a few hours. Thus John McCain spent another week tarnishing his brand as independent of his party's conventional wisdom. After having shown himself willing to commit the heresy of taking climate change seriously, he decided that maybe we should be burning more hydrocarbons after all.

Joe Biden, speaking on Meet the Press, pointed out that oil companies already have enormous offshore reserves at their disposal:

This is a gift, a gift to the oil companies by John McCain. They have now leased 41 million acres of offshore leases. They're only pumping in 10.2 million of those acres. Seventy-nine percent of all the offshore oil available off the coast of Florida, into the Gulf of Mexico, the Atlantic Coast, the Pacific Coast, lies within those acres that they now have.Even supporters of increased offshore drilling acknowledge that it would take as long as ten years to get more gasoline to the pumps. But if we're talking ten years, why go with an old, dying technology? If we get a go-ahead from the General Assembly, we could have the first offshore wind power project in the U.S. up and running in three years.

So it would take the U.S. three times longer to prop up the fossil fuels business by ruining our coastal waters than it would to get offshore wind power going. Apart from the question of which you would rather see off your coast, the new clean technology will do more, sooner to provide us with needed energy than the dirty old business could.

Beyond weakening his reputation for independence, John McCain has shown himself to be the candidate of the past instead of the future.

Origin: cleanpowerlife.blogspot.com

Related Posts:

  • Pros And Cons Of Big Hydropower Big Dams: Pros, Cons, and Consequences - University of - Megadams: Pros, Cons, and Consequences. Humans have diverted water from its natural channels throughout history. Remains of water storage dams are found in... Hydropow… Read More
  • Ngo Jobs In Nairobi Kenya AadlSUMMARY: Aldwych Africa Developments Limited (AADL) is a Kenyan registered company fully owned by Aldwych Holdings Limited, registered in the England and is an InfraCo Africa partner. The Aldwych group of companies develops, … Read More
  • Clean Energy Revolution The clean energy revolution is accelerating! Wind power in America surpassed 50 gigawatts this year! This is enough energy to power approximately 13 million homes, or Nevada, Colorado, Wisconsin, Virginia, Alabama, and Conne… Read More
  • Do Solar Panels Increase House Value You might be thinking about buying a house with solar PV already installed, or you might have solar PV on your roof and you are looking to sell your property. In the article below we look at whether solar PV increases the va… Read More
  • Gev Wind Power To Present Its Cost Saving Developments In Turbine Blade Maintenance At Ewea 2015 GEV Wind Power, one of Europe's leading maintenance companies in the wind energy sector, will be exhibiting its cutting edge advancements in turbine blade maintenance at EWEA Offshore in Copenhagen on 10-12th March 2015. GEV… Read More